Dallas Fort Worth Injury Lawyer Blog

A recent Australian study indicates that the newer technology for artificial hips and knees did not perform any better than older, well tested and less expensive designs.

This week, data was published from Australia’s orthopedic registry, which covered implants introduced from 2003 to 2007. The study’s findings are significant for patients in the United States because many of the new designs, like the metal-on-metal hips, are widely used here and have come under increasing scrutiny.

These metal on metal implants, consist of a ball and cup made of metal, and according to experts are expected to fail prematurely in tens of thousands of patients. The artificial joints were marketed to last 15 years or more and provide better mobility and be more durable for the elderly population.

The safety of Bayer’s two blockbuster oral contraceptives, Yaz and Yasmin, have been called into question. These drugs which were the first to contain a progestin known as drospirenone, which is now used in a number of generic versions of the pills.

Yaz and Yasmin have been implicated in the formation of blood clots, a condition known as venous thrombo-embolism (VTE). The FDA recently found that Yaz and Yasmin side effects increased the risk of blood clots 74% when compared to older birth control pills that use levonorgestrel as a progestin instead of drospirenone. A number of other independent studies have shown an increased risk of blood clots from Yaz and Yasmin as well.

Newly unsealed documents, revealed during discovery in thousands of Yaz and Yasmin lawsuits being pursued against Bayer, indicate that experts believe that the company kept important safety data from federal regulators. Ex FDA Chief, Kessler gave expert opinion testimony that Bayer purposefully mislead the FDA about Yaz and Yasmin’s safety by selectively presenting data on blood clots and other thromboembolic events to make the drugs appear to be safer than they really were.

Accutane side effects and injuries have prompted 6,634 people to file an Accutane lawsuit in New Jersey against the manufacturer of the controversial acne drug, Hoffman-LaRoche.

A master complaint was filed as more plaintiffs joined the Accutane mass tort lawsuit. The purpose of the master complaint is to centralize the plaintiffs’ common allegations, which include Accutane Crohns disease and Ulcerative Colitis. The master complaint alleges that Hoffman-LaRoche created a defective product and negligently marketed that product to consumers.

Furthermore, the complaint alleges that the company failed to warn consumers about the serious side effects associated with Accutane use; inflammatory bowel disease, (IBD). The complaint also alleges that Hoffman-LaRoche failed to take the product off the market once the bowel side effects, birth defects and suicide were known.

St. Jude Medical Inc.’s Riata defibrillator leads, which the company stopped selling last year, were recalled by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration because of their potential to injure or kill patients.

The devices remain implanted in an estimated 79,000 U.S. patients. The company voluntarily sent a letter to doctors on November 28 informing them that the wires used to connect the devices to the heart have a higher failure rate than was previously known.

According to the company, the FDA issued the Class 1 recall, its most serious designation, because of its potential risk of serious injury or patient death.

The FDA have added new safety warnings to the heart rhythm drug Multaq, (dronedarone) after Sanofi company study linked the medication to higher rates of heart attack, stroke and death in a subset of patients. The FDA completed a safety review of dronedarone, which showed that the heart drug increased the risk for serious CV events, including death, when used by patients with permanent atrial fibrillation.

The review was based on data from the PALLAS and ATHENA trials. As a result of the review, the FDA has provided new information and recommendations for use of dronedarone to manage the potential serious CV events associated with the drug, according to a statement from the agency.

The boxed warning highlights the results of a study in which Multaq doubled the risk of heart-related complications in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation. The revised label indicates that Multaq is only approved for the short-term form of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Doctors routinely prescribe drugs for conditions not listed on the labeling approved by the FDA, a process called “off label prescribing.”

The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) has rejected calls for all federal Plavix lawsuits to be consolidated in one court for coordinated handling during pre-trial litigation. This means that the litigation will proceed as individual cases in various district courts throughout the United States.

Last week, the JPML denied a motion by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Sanofi-Aventis to centralize the federal Plavix litigation in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. According to the panel, the centralization would not help move the cases through the system faster and would provide no benefit to the parties involved.

There are currently only 12 lawsuits filed against Plavix pending in the federal court system, with 10 of them pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.

According to plaintiffs’ lawyers, Knauf Plasterboard Tianjin Co., (KPT) a Chinese drywall maker, agreed to pay at least $800 million to settle homeowner claims that defective building materials contaminated their homes with corrosive sulfur fumes.

Knauf agreed to settle claims involving about 4,500 properties that contain the defective drywall. Homeowners said the faulty wallboard emits noxious sulphur gases that corrodes copper coils and electrical and plumbing equipment.

The accord was announced before U.S. District Judge Eldon Fallon in New Orleans, who is overseeing about 12,000 suits filed over the contaminated drywall that have been consolidated for pretrial evidence gathering.

As public awareness of problems with artificial hips and other medical implants increase, legislation was introduced in the Senate that would force manufacturers to track the performance of such products after they were approved for sale.

The bill would allow the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to compel companies to track medical implants.

The bill is to address the controversial 510(k) process that the FDA uses to clear the sale of certain implants like artificial joints. To sell a new product under 510(k) process, a producer need only show that it is “substantially similar” to a product already on the market.

A motion has been filed with the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) to consolidate and centralize all federal Wright Conserve hip replacement lawsuits. These lawsuits have been brought in courts throughout the United States by individuals who experienced injury problems after receiving the metal-on-metal artificial hip system.

Several lawsuits have been filed against Wright Medical in different federal district courts through the nation by individuals who complain that their metal-on-metal Wright Conserve Plus hip system failed within a few years of implant, often resulting in the need for revision surgery.

Since the FDA approved the Wright metal-on-metal hip replacement system under their controversial 510(k) approval system, more than 200 adverse event reports have been submitted by patients or physicians, which likely only represents a small percentage of the total number of problems with Wright Conserve hip replacements.