Dr Shezad Malik Law Firm has offices based in Fort Worth and Dallas and represents people who have suffered catastrophic and serious personal injuries including wrongful death, caused by the negligence or recklessness of others. We specialize in Personal Injury trial litigation and focus our energy and efforts on those we represent.

Pfizer Jury to Award $75 M Prempro Verdict to Woman

Pfizer Inc. must pay about $75 million in punitive damages to an Illinois woman who developed cancer after taking one of the drugmaker’s menopause treatments.

A Philadelphia jury ordered Pfizer’s Wyeth unit on Oct. 26 to pay the bad-conduct award, which is about 20 times larger than the $3.7 million in actual damages the panel awarded to Connie Barton over her use of Wyeth’s Prempro menopause drug, according to people with direct knowledge of the verdict.

A judge ordered Barton’s punitive-damage award sealed at Wyeth’s request until the trial of another Prempro lawsuit in the same courthouse is completed. Lawyers in that case say jurors won’t start deliberating on that suit’s claims for another three weeks.

More than 6 million women have taken hormone-replacement medicines to treat menopause symptoms including hot flashes, night sweats and mood swings. Until 1995, many patients combined Premarin, Wyeth’s estrogen-based drug, with progestin-laden Provera, made by Upjohn, another Pfizer unit.

Wyeth, which hasn’t reserved funds to cover losses in the litigation, later combined the two hormones in Prempro. The drugs are still on the market. New York-based Pfizer completed its $68 billion purchase of Wyeth Oct. 15.

Annual sales of Wyeth’s hormone-replacement drugs topped $2 billion before the 2002 Women’s Health Initiative study, sponsored by the U.S. National Institutes of Health, suggested women using the medicines had a higher breast-cancer risk.

The jury found Wyeth’s conduct in marketing and selling the drug was “willful and wanton,” opening the company up to punitive damages under Pennsylvania law.

Barton’s lawyers presented evidence during the trial about Wyeth officials’ efforts to “deflect” criticism of the company’s handling of the drug and its use of ghostwritten articles in medical journals to market the medicine. They also alleged executives hid Prempro’s cancer risks to pump up the drug’s sales.

Barton’s punitive award of about $75 million is the third surviving verdict in Prempro cases since juries began deciding them in 2006. The largest award was handed down to three women who blamed the drugs for their breast cancers in 2007.

Jurors in state court in Reno, Nevada awarded the trio a total of $99 million in punitive damages. That figure was later reduced to $35 million and is being appealed.

A federal appeals court earlier this week ordered a new trial on punitive damages for an Arkansas woman’s claims that Wyeth’s mishandling of Prempro caused her breast cancer.

Barton, a retired records clerk from Peoria, Illinois, took Prempro for five years before developing breast cancer in 2002. Jurors in Philadelphia concluded Prempro helped cause the illness and the manufacturer failed to warn Barton and her doctors adequately about the drug’s risks.

Philadelphia Common Pleas Court Judge Sandra Moss, who oversees all the court’s product-liability cases, said last week that she agreed to seal Barton’s punitive award to protect the rights of other litigants involved in an ongoing trial in the same courthouse over the drug.

Moss said in a court hearing that when the next Prempro trial is completed, she’ll unseal the Barton verdict and another punitive award handed down in a 2007 Prempro case.

In Barton’s case, Judge Norman Ackerman instructed jurors not to reveal their verdict until being advised by the court that the award had been unsealed. Barton, her lawyers and Wyeth’s lawyers were able to review the award.

Pfizer’s Wyeth unit has now lost five of eight trials, including the last three in a row, over the drugs since cases began reaching juries in 2006. Thirty-three Prempro cases have been set for trial so far, and 19 have been thrown out by judges or withdrawn by plaintiffs, according to Pfizer officials.

The company has won three defense verdicts and two losses were thrown out at the post-trial stage. The remaining verdicts are being appealed. Wyeth also has settled at least five cases over the drugs.

The case is Barton v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc., 040406301, Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania.

If you or a family member has been personally injured because of the fault of someone else: by the use of dangerous and defective drugs, bad products, or toxic injury etc then please contact the Fort Worth Texas Defective Drugs Product Liability Attorney Dr. Shezad Malik. For a no obligation, free case analysis, please call 817-255-4001 or Contact Me Online.

The Dr. Shezad Malik Law Firm is currently evaluating and accepting Yaz, Yasmin and Ocella Side Effect cases.

Contact Information